# What is Neutron Flux Density – Neutron Intensity – Definition

Definition of the neutron flux density, neutron intensity and neutron density. Neutron flux is a scalar quantity, while neutron intensity is a vector quantity. Reactor Physics

## Neutron Flux Density

In the section the neutron cross-section, it was determined the probability of a neutron undergoing a specific neutron-nuclear reaction. It was determined the mean free path of neutrons in the material under specific conditions. These parameters influences the criticality of the reactor core. In other words, we do not know anything about the power level of the reactor core. If we want to know the reaction rate or thermal power of the reactor core, it is necessary to know how many neutrons are traveling through the material.

It is convenient to consider the neutron density, that is the number of neutrons existing in one cubic centimeter. The neutron density is represented by the symbol n with units of neutrons/cm3. In reactor physics, the neutron flux is more likely used, because it expresses better the total path length covered by all neutrons. The total distance these neutrons can travel each second is determined by their velocity and therefore the neutron flux density value is calculated as the neutron density (n) multiplied by neutron velocity (v).

Ф = n.v

where:
Ф – neutron flux (neutrons.cm-2.s-1)
n – neutron density (neutrons.cm-3)
v – neutron velocity (cm.s-1) Distribution of kinetic energies of neutrons in the thermal reactor and in the fast neutrons reactor. The fission neutrons (fast flux) in the thermal reactor are immediately slowed down to the thermal energies via a process called neutron moderation.
The neutron flux, which is the number of neutrons crossing through some arbitrary cross-sectional unit area in all directions per unit time, is a scalar quantity. Therefore it is also known as the scalar flux. The expression Ф(E).dE is the total distance traveled during one second by all neutrons with energies between E and dE located in 1 cm3.

The connection to the reaction rate, respectively the reactor power, is obvious. Knowledge of the neutron flux (the total path length of all the neutrons in a cubic centimeter in a second) and the macroscopic cross sections (the probability of having an interaction per centimeter path length) allows us to compute the rate of interactions (e.g. rate of fission reactions). The reaction rate (the number of interactions taking place in that cubic centimeter in one second) is then given by multiplying them together: where:
Ф – neutron flux (neutrons.cm-2.s-1)
σ – microscopic cross section (cm2)
N – atomic number density (atoms.cm-3)

We have to distinguish between the neutron flux and the neutron intensity. Although both physical quantities have the same units, namely, neutrons.cm-2.s-1, their physical interpretations are different. In contrast to the neutron flux, the neutron intensity is the number of neutrons crossing through some arbitrary cross-sectional unit area in a single direction per unit time (a surface is perpendicular to the direction of the beam). The neutron intensity is a vector quantity.

Example - Neutron flux in a typical thermal reactor core
A typical thermal reactor contains about 100 tons of uranium with an average enrichment of 2% (do not confuse it with the enrichment of the fresh fuel). If the reactor power is 3000MWth, determine the reaction rate and the average core thermal flux.

Solution:

Multiplying the reaction rate per unit volume (RR = Ф . Σ) by the total volume of the core (V) gives us the total number of reactions occurring in the reactor core per unit time. But we also know the amount of energy released per one fission reaction to be about 200 MeV/fission. Now, it is possible to determine the rate of energy release (power) due to the fission reaction. It is given by following equation:

P = Ф . Σf . Er . V = Ф . NU235 . σf235 . Er . V

where:
P – reactor power (MeV.s-1)
Ф – neutron flux (neutrons.cm-2.s-1)
σ – microscopic cross section (cm2)
N – atomic number density (atoms.cm-3)
Er – the average recoverable energy per fission (MeV / fission)
V – total volume of the core (m3)

The amount of fissile 235U per the volume of the reactor core.

m235 [g/core] = 100 [metric tons] x 0.02 [g of 235U / g of U] . 106 [g/metric ton] = 2 x 106 grams of 235U per the volume of the reactor core

The atomic number density of 235U in the volume of the reactor core:

N235 . V = m235 . NA / M235
= 2 x 106 [g 235 / core] x 6.022 x 1023 [atoms/mol] / 235 [g/mol] = 5.13 x 1027 atoms / core
The microscopic fission cross-section of 235U (for thermal neutrons):

σf235 = 585 barns

The average recoverable energy per 235U fission:

Er = 200.7 MeV/fission Example - Neutron flux in a MOX fueled thermal reactor core
Mixed oxide fuel, commonly referred to as MOX fuel, is nuclear fuel that contains more than one oxide of fissile material. MOX fuels usually consist of plutonium blended with natural uranium. For simplicity and for purposes of this example, it will be assumed, that the reactor core contains only MOX fuel (100% MOX) and that the averaged percentage of plutonium (averaged over all the used fuel assemblies – not all FAs are fresh FAs) in MOX fuel is equal to 4%. Note that, the initial percentage of plutonium in fresh MOX fuel is around ~7%.

Moreover, it will be assumed, the recycled plutonium contains only the fissile 239Pu. In reality, MOX fuel always contain significant amounts of higher isotopes – 240Pu, 241Pu and 242Pu. The presence of these amounts will be neglected in this example.

A typical thermal reactor contains about 100 tons of fuel (HM – heavy metal). If the reactor power is 3000MWth, determine the reaction rate and the average core thermal flux.

Solution:

Multiplying the reaction rate per unit volume (RR = Ф . Σ) by the total volume of the core (V) gives us the total number of reactions occurring in the reactor core per unit time. But we also know the amount of energy released per one fission reaction is about 207 MeV/fission. Now, it is possible to determine the rate of energy release (power) due to the fission reaction, it is given by following equation:

P = Ф . Σf . Er . V = Ф . NPu239 . σf239 . Er . V

where:
P – reactor power (MeV.s-1)
Ф – neutron flux (neutrons.cm-2.s-1)
σ – microscopic cross section (cm2)
N – atomic number density (atoms.cm-3)
Er – the average recoverable energy per fission (MeV / fission)
V – total volume of the core (m3)

The amount of fissile 239Pu per the volume of the reactor core.

m239 [g/core] = 100 [metric tons] x 0.02 [g of 239Pu / g of fuel] . 106 [g/metric ton] = 4 x 106 grams of 239Pu per the volume of the reactor core

The atomic number density of 239Pu in the volume of the reactor core:

N239 . V = m239 . NA / M239
= 4 x 106 [g 239 / core] x 6.022 x 1023 [atoms/mol] / 239 [g/mol] = 10.1 x 1027 atoms / core
The microscopic fission cross-section of 235U (for thermal neutrons):

σf239 = 750 barns

The average recoverable energy per 239Pu fission:

Er = 207 MeV/fission ## Neutron Flux – Uranium vs. MOX

Note that, there is a difference between neutron fluxes in the uranium fueled core and the MOX fueled core. The average neutron flux in the first example, in which the neutron flux in a uranium loaded reactor core was calculated, was 3.11 x 1013  neutrons.cm-2.s-1. In comparison with this value, the average neutron flux in 100% MOX fueled core is about 2.6 times lower (1.2 x 1013  neutrons.cm-2.s-1), while the reaction rate remains almost the same. This fact is of importance in the reactor core design and in the design of reactivity control. It is primarily caused by:

• higher fission cross-section of 239Pu. The fission cross-section is about 750 barns in comparison with 585 barns for 235U.
• higher energy release per one fission event. In order to generate the same amount energy a MOX core do not require such the neutron flux as a uranium fueled core.
• larger fissile loading. The main reason is in the larger fissile loading. In MOX fuels, there is relatively high buildup of 240Pu and 242Pu. Due to the relatively lower fission-to-capture ratio, there is higher accumulation of these isotopes, which are parasitic absorbers and that results in a reactivity penalty. In general, the average regeneration factor η is lower for 239Pu fuel than for 235U fuel. Therefore the MOX fuel requires a larger fissile loading to achieve the same initial excess of reactivity at the beginning of the fuel cycle.

The relatively lower average neutron flux is MOX cores has following consequences on reactor core design:

• Because of the lower neutron flux and the larger thermal absorption cross section for 239Pu, reactivity worth of control rods, chemical shim (PWRs) and burnable absorbers is less with MOX fuel.
• The high fission cross-section of  239Pu and the lower neutron flux lead to greater power peaking in fuel rods that are located near water gaps or when MOX fuel is loaded with uranium fuel together.

## Neutron Flux and Fuel Burnup

In a power reactor over a relatively short period of time (days or weeks), the atomic number density of the fuel atoms remains relatively constant. Therefore in this short period, also the average neutron flux remains constant, when reactor is operated at a constant power level. On the other hand, the atomic number densities of fissile isotopes over a period of months decrease due to the fuel burnup and therefore also the macroscopic cross-sections decrease. This results is slow increase in the neutron flux in order to keep the desired power level.

References:
Nuclear and Reactor Physics:
1. J. R. Lamarsh, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Theory, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1983).
2. J. R. Lamarsh, A. J. Baratta, Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, 3d ed., Prentice-Hall, 2001, ISBN: 0-201-82498-1.
3. W. M. Stacey, Nuclear Reactor Physics, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, ISBN: 0- 471-39127-1.
4. Glasstone, Sesonske. Nuclear Reactor Engineering: Reactor Systems Engineering, Springer; 4th edition, 1994, ISBN: 978-0412985317
5. W.S.C. Williams. Nuclear and Particle Physics. Clarendon Press; 1 edition, 1991, ISBN: 978-0198520467
6. G.R.Keepin. Physics of Nuclear Kinetics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co; 1st edition, 1965
7. Robert Reed Burn, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Operation, 1988.
8. U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory. DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Volume 1 and 2. January 1993.

1. K. O. Ott, W. A. Bezella, Introductory Nuclear Reactor Statics, American Nuclear Society, Revised edition (1989), 1989, ISBN: 0-894-48033-2.
2. K. O. Ott, R. J. Neuhold, Introductory Nuclear Reactor Dynamics, American Nuclear Society, 1985, ISBN: 0-894-48029-4.
3. D. L. Hetrick, Dynamics of Nuclear Reactors, American Nuclear Society, 1993, ISBN: 0-894-48453-2.
4. E. E. Lewis, W. F. Miller, Computational Methods of Neutron Transport, American Nuclear Society, 1993, ISBN: 0-894-48452-4.